Hankook Kinergy 4S

The Hankook Kinergy 4S is a High Performance All Season tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

Tyre review data from 12 tyre reviews averaging 75% over 134,500 miles driven, and 17 tests with an average result of 6th.

Dry Grip 80%
Wet Grip 74%
Road Feedback 72%
Handling 65%
Wear 69%
Comfort 75%
Buy again 68%
Snow Grip 90%
Ice Grip 80%

First On MarketMay 2021
Wheel Size13 - 18"
Width135 - 255mm
Profile40 - 80
Rolling ResistanceB - D
Wet GripB - D
Noise (dB)66 - 73
Winter Rating3PMSF Rated

The Kinergy 4S is ranked 16th of 30 All Season High Performance tyres.

This tyre has been replaced by the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Tests Included

17

Best Result

4th

Worst Result

9th

Average Result

6th

Latest Tyre Test Results

2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test
5th of 10 tyres
  • High resistance to aquaplaning, well priced.
  • Higher noise levels, long braking distances on snow and dry roads.
  • Recommended.
View Full Test >>
2018 ADAC All Season Tyre Test
8th of 11 tyres
  • Low wear.
  • Weak in the snow and on wet roads.
View Full Test >>
New VS 4mm VS 2mm All Season Tyre Performance
4th of 6 tyres
  • Like the Pirelli, the Hankook is only safe when new, with the snow and wet performance dropping with tyre wear. The dry performance increases as the tread wears. Poor wear. Conditionally recommended.
View Full Test >>

SizeFuelWetNoise
13 inch
155/80R13 79 TDC71
14 inch
165/70R14 85 T XLDC71
175/65R14 86 T XLDC71
165/70R14 85 T XLDC71
175/65R14 86 T XLDC71
185/60R14 82 HDC71
165/70R14 81 TCC69
175/65R14 82 TDC71
185/70R14 88 TCC71
15 inch
195/65R15 95 T XLDC71
185/65R15 88 TDC71
195/55R15 85 HDC72
185/65R15 88 HDC71
195/55R15 85 HDC72
195/65R15 91 HDC72
195/65R15 95 H XLCC71
195/65R15 91 VDC72
195/65R15 95 H XLDC71
16 inch
205/55R16 91 HDC72
205/55R16 94 V XLDC72
205/55R16 91 HDC72
205/55R16 94 V XLDC72
205/60R16 92 VCC72
215/60R16 99 H XLCC72
205/60R16 92 HBD67
205/60R16 92 HCB71
215/60R16 95 VCC72
17 inch
225/50R17 94 VCC71
205/50R17 93 V XLCC72
215/45R17 91 V XLDC72
235/65R17 108 V XLCC72
225/50R17 98 V XLCC72
225/60R17 99 HDC72
225/45R17 94 V XLDC72
215/55R17 98 W XLCC72
18 inch
225/40R18 92 V XLDC72
235/60R18 107 V XLCC72
225/40R18 88 VDC72
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Hankook Kinergy 4S >>

Questions and Answers for the Hankook Kinergy 4S

2023-03-25 - Hi, How come this tyre came higher than the Goodyear in the all season test yet the tyre data is lower than the Goodyear? Where does the information come from. Thanks

It was the newer 4S2 version of this tyre in the Tyre Reviews test. The bars at the top are an aggregation of the user review data not the test data.


Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

capatha

To verify you're human please type the word you see above in the box below.


Size Price Range  
Available in 2 tyre sizes - View all.

YouTube Review

Top 3 Hankook Kinergy 4S Reviews

Given 20% while driving a Honda (235/60 R18) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
I recently got a flat so I took my car in to my trusted car maintenance folks and they said they couldn't fix it, or put on two of the four tires because of the tread wear on them. I have a 2021 Honda CR-V and these were the stock tires Honda opted to put on the car. At roughly 24,000 miles I need new tires. This is absurd. Most of the tires this size are rated for a minimum 50K miles and I got less than half. In some places I've seen these tires rated for 70K. Absurd. I've never liked the noise from these tires or the handling but didn't realize until today just how cheap these tires actually are. Never Hankook again and maybe not Honda again if this is the cheap tire they are opting to put on their cars. Additionally, Honda doesn't cover these tires in their warranty, they expect the tire manufacturer to cover them. Guess what, Hankook doesn't provide a mileage minimum on their tires, likely because they know how awful and cheap these tires are as well. HORRIBLE customer experience.
Helpful 21 - tyre reviewed on August 15, 2023
Given 83% while driving a Dacia Duster 4x4 (215/65 R16) on a combination of roads for 36,000 spirited miles
Overall I am satisfied about my decision to buy them, but I was disappointed about the fact they wore very fast, faster than expected, after 58 000 km - compared with the Continental stock tires. I had another pairs of tires ALL SEASONS CONTINENTAL ALLSEASONCONTACT (I was happy with them, too). Even now, after 2 years, on dry surface the Hankooks are almost freezing my Duster (1.6, 4 x 4, petrol, 2016) when a person is appearing from nowhere at a pedestrian cross (having 50 km/h). During work time I am driving 200 km / 5 days. On highways wet surfaces I had full control. I drove on mud, too, they kept me going forward. Slowly. but surely. In summer times I am going to mountains roads and hilltops, nothing special, no aggressive off-road, just pebbled, dust and forest roads. On forest and pebbled roads they behaved very well, but there were noisy. I used them in the winter on snow on Transfagarasan from Capra Chalet till Salvamont Arges refuge Cota 2000. I won`t buy them again because they wore (as I mentioned) too fast.
Helpful 7 - tyre reviewed on November 4, 2024
Given 87% while driving a Mitsubishi Lancer 1.8 4 Door (2008) (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 3,000 average miles
These tyres replaced some nasty Nankang tyres however on my other cars i run Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2.

First impressions have been good, the wet grip is night and day in comparison to cheaper brand tyres, they handled a 70 - 0 emergency stop when a lorry pulled out in the wet very well. the car feels a lot more composed and competent. The real test will be how they cope with snow (if we get any) and how they wear during the summer months. For a everyday car they seem a good all round Tyre with the potential to offer added safety in the winter months at a good price and without the hassle of changing to winter rubber. For sporty and powerful vehicles i believe that the best is still a dedicated winter tyre and summer tyre.
Helpful 76 - tyre reviewed on December 17, 2015
Have you driven on the Hankook Kinergy 4S tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Hankook Kinergy 4S? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Hankook Kinergy 4S >

Latest Hankook Kinergy 4S Reviews

Given 84% while driving a Citroën C3 (175/70 R14 T) on a combination of roads for 16,000 average miles
Replaced some old Hankook summer tyres in October 2015 with these Hankook H740 4S tyres as I wanted better wet and snow grip. I was limited for choice due to uncommon tyre size and didn't want directional tyres as I had a full size alloy spare. The 2nd day after fitting I had to travel on the M62 and was caught in a torrential rain storm. Cars if front of me started drifting all ways after hitting a huge area of standing water, so I braced myself, but needn't have worried. These Hankook H740 4S tyres took it all in their stride and the car stayed in a straight line with no effort from me. Handling is great in all conditions. They have now done 16,000 miles and at my last service 2 months ago I was told they would easily last another year at least, based on my requirements, as I always replace tyres when the tread gets below 4mm. I shall replace them with the same ones when required.
Helpful 42 - tyre reviewed on January 18, 2019
Given 44% while driving a Volkswagen up! (165/70 R14 Q) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
Dangerous in wet breaking. ABS always on, wet seems snow. Bad even in dry roads. Never again
Helpful 47 - tyre reviewed on June 23, 2018
What to know the BEST All Season Tyres for 2024? Click to find out!
Given 100% while driving a Volkswagen Golf 1.9 Tdi (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 23,000 average miles
This is an update to my previous review, to report on the snow performance.

Scotland had a wee bit of bad weather at the start of March '18. For reasons I won't get into on here, I was required to drive through the red weather warning on both days, and the subsequent amber warnings of the rest of the week and this gave me a good opportunity to assess performance in snow/slush and ice. The front tyres had around 5mm left in them (having been swapped after doing 18k on the rear), the rears were effectively brand new, maybe a few thousand miles since fitting.

And that performance was exceptional.

Motorways were cleared, but icy in places. They never feit like they were going to let go without warning. They did give enough feedback to allow easing off before anything went pear shaped.

Surface streets were variable quality, with some roads in excess of 12" of snow. Others had slush and others a mix of hard pack and fresh snow. And we charged on through. Even fairly steep hills were dispatched without drama, just an occasional touch of traction control for some of worst parts. These tyres on this car means I'm getting to my destination regardless.

Now, a downside... during the snow, I damaged 2 of them (potholes can still bite when they're hidden). Thankfully, I've managed to source some replacements, they're fitted, and I'm a happy bunny again.
Helpful 35 - tyre reviewed on March 17, 2018
Given 81% while driving a Toyota Yaris (175/65 R14) on a combination of roads for 3,000 easy going miles
Have you ever wondered how the snow plow driver gets to work in the middle of the worst snow. These tyres no 4x4 required.
Helpful 42 - tyre reviewed on March 6, 2018
Given 79% while driving a Volkswagen Golf 1.9 Tdi (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 18,000 spirited miles
My car was bought 2nd hand from a well known Scottish car dealer network, and had been fitted with some of their own branded tyres. They lasted less than a week before they were binned.

So, January of 2017 saw a set of Kinergys fitted. And they worked well in the snow, very well. They were also quite impressive in some of the torrential rain we had through the year, and pretty good in the 2 days of sunshine that passes for a Scottish summer.

I drive an estate, and tend to lug a fair amount of kit everywhere, and in an enthusiastic fashion. They've been good in almost all conditions except for some occasional understeer on a rather tight mini roundabout near home. But that's only ever been when the conditions have been greasy. Performance in heavy rain on motorways has been on a par with some of the more expensive rubber I've had fitted to other similar vehicles. But the winter performance has been impressive.

Wear has also been acceptable. Roughly 18000 miles done, the fronts are below 4mm, the rears are still above 6mm. Purely as a precaution, and because of the long term weather reports, the fronts were replaced with more of the same in the last few weeks. And, again, they have proven to be good in the snow and cold temps of the last month. At £50 a corner, they're exceptionally good value, and will be a permanent fixture on this particular vehicle for the foreseeable future.
Helpful 32 - tyre reviewed on November 25, 2017
Given 49% while driving a BMW 316 (205/55 R16) on mostly town for 4,500 easy going miles
We used the previous generation of these tyres the H730 and unfortunately these are a great disappointment. My wife and I have both been sliding on greasy roads - in a 90bhp bmw!! - when the previous set didn't do this even when they were nearly done - so far this set has 4500miles. I honestly won't be buying the h740s again back to the h730s if I can get them.
Helpful 42 - tyre reviewed on January 19, 2017
Given 76% while driving a Honda Civic Type R (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 1,000 spirited miles
So i replaced Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2's on my EP3 Civic Type R with these. I tried these tyres last year on another car when it snowed and my civic could not get out of the very steep estate and they were phenomenally good in the snow.

These tyres are very good, they do feel like they provide less feedback than the Goodyear Eagles and less lateral grip however they are still very good. I feel that the loss in summer traction/feedback is worth the advantage when its wet/cold/snow handling. They feel surprisingly planted in the wet and are still miles better in all conditions compared to cheap budget summer tyres. The car will not brake traction under hard acceleration which it would do previously on Toyo proxes..

Conclusion: Good compromise for massive winter benefits. No all season will be as good as a dedicated summer performance tyre. Snow handling profoundly strong, going up large steep hills with compacted ice and snow the car did not brake traction once.
Helpful 34 - tyre reviewed on August 24, 2016
Given 82% while driving a Daihatsu Trevis (155/65 R14 T) on mostly town for 10,000 easy going miles
I've bought these tyres ti replace stock tyres with a 4season.
Till now, I'm reslly satisfied on dry, wet and also snow!
Let's see during the summer
Helpful 31 - tyre reviewed on February 24, 2016
Given 86% while driving a Fiat Panda (175/65 R15 H) on mostly country roads for 10,000 spirited miles
Having replace Yokohama W703,W902 and Conti's winter as a primary installation, I've to admit that the latest is the best choice so far, offering better braking distance, low noise and prodigious grip in wet. Can't say much for durability since I've made only 10K. Price was the same with Yokohama's cheaper from Conti's: 240 Euros, in Greece.
Helpful 48 - tyre reviewed on December 16, 2015